Toby Keith's song I Wanna Talk About Me (with lyrics)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX5xk1G_Dzs
PS- Obama's call for 'a new tone' falls on deaf ears -- including his own -- because HE is tone deaf.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Obama's policy on terrorism makes America less safe!
Obama's policy INVITES terrorists abroad onto American soil, because for them, being Mirandized HERE, AFTER they attack, is more advantageous than being killed there, before they attack.
So much for Obama having OUR BACK...
Obama will grant the 9/11 terrorists rights under OUR Constitution.
And Obama will bring the 9/11 terrorists BACK to Ground Zero.
So much for Obama having OUR BACK.
And Obama will bring the 9/11 terrorists BACK to Ground Zero.
So much for Obama having OUR BACK.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
BREAKING NEWS from Big Brother:
You too can HOST YOUR OWN marshmallow-roasting Kumbaya-singing Little Red Book-reading PARTY for Chairman Obamao!
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/sotuwatchparty/
PS- Wow! Obama wasted no time bringing his old Campaign Manager Plouffe back into the mix...of quicksand.
My response to Obama's SOTU? STFU!
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/sotuwatchparty/
PS- Wow! Obama wasted no time bringing his old Campaign Manager Plouffe back into the mix...of quicksand.
My response to Obama's SOTU? STFU!
Really...
I dismiss those who say Obama may try to be the final US President, but what would be done differently if that wasn't the case?
Face it...
Face it: We knew that Obama was the Narcissist-in-Chief when he so (in)famously said, "We are the ones we've been waiting for."
Who is the most pro-abortion President in American history?
Who is the most pro-abortion President in American history?
Barack Obama!
Yes, the same 'man' whose Science Czar wanted sterility drugs in drinking water.
Barack Obama!
Yes, the same 'man' whose Science Czar wanted sterility drugs in drinking water.
Obama's Astroturfing...
The question isn't "Who's Ellie Light?"
The question is "Who told all those newspaper editors to PUBLISH his or her letters?"
The question is "Who told all those newspaper editors to PUBLISH his or her letters?"
Sunday, January 24, 2010
"Freeeeeeeeeeeeedom!!!"
Obama leaned over and heard America gasping...then turned to the crowd and said, "The prisoner wishes to say a word."
America responded: "Freeeeeeeeeeeeedom!!!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnitdUvWx8k
America responded: "Freeeeeeeeeeeeedom!!!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnitdUvWx8k
Friday, January 22, 2010
"Hello, McFly?"
I think Obama is so damn narcissistic that the ONLY job he's interested in saving is HIS!
He better start listening to We the People, or it won't just be his supporters in Mass. who left him...
It'll be his supporters EN MASSE!
He better start listening to We the People, or it won't just be his supporters in Mass. who left him...
It'll be his supporters EN MASSE!
Charles Krauthammer says, "Let them sleep."
Charles Krauthammer - What Scott Brown's win means for the Democrats - washingtonpost.com
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/21/AR2010012103500.html
What Scott Brown's win means for the Democrats
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, January 22, 2010
On Jan. 14, five days before the Massachusetts special election, President Obama was in full bring-it-on mode as he rallied House Democrats behind his health-care reform. "If Republicans want to campaign against what we've done by standing up for the status quo and for insurance companies over American families and businesses, that is a fight I want to have."
The bravado lasted three days. When Obama campaigned in Boston on Jan. 17 for Obamacare supporter Martha Coakley, not once did he mention the health-care bill. When your candidate is sinking, you don't throw her a millstone.
After Coakley's defeat, Obama pretended that the real cause was a generalized anger and frustration "not just because of what's happened in the last year or two years, but what's happened over the last eight years."
Let's get this straight: The antipathy to George W. Bush is so enduring and powerful that . . . it just elected a Republican senator in Massachusetts? Why, the man is omnipotent.
And the Democrats are delusional: Scott Brown won by running against Obama, not Bush. He won by brilliantly nationalizing the race, running hard against the Obama agenda, most notably Obamacare. Killing it was his No. 1 campaign promise.
Bull's-eye. An astonishing 56 percent of Massachusetts voters, according to a Rasmussen poll, called health care their top issue. In a Fabrizio, McLaughlin & Associates poll, 78 percent of Brown voters said their vote was intended to stop Obamacare. Only a quarter of all voters in the Rasmussen poll cited the economy as their top issue, nicely refuting the Democratic view that Massachusetts was just the usual anti-incumbent resentment you expect in bad economic times.
Brown ran on a very specific, very clear agenda. Stop health care. Don't Mirandize terrorists. Don't raise taxes; cut them. And no more secret backroom deals with special interests.
These deals -- the Louisiana purchase, the Cornhusker kickback -- had engendered a national disgust with the corruption and arrogance of one-party rule. The final straw was the union payoff -- in which labor bosses smugly walked out of the White House with a five-year exemption from a ("Cadillac") health insurance tax Democrats were imposing on the 92 percent of private-sector workers who are not unionized.
The reason both wings of American liberalism -- congressional and mainstream media -- were so surprised at the force of anti-Democratic sentiment is that they'd spent Obama's first year either ignoring or disdaining the clear early signs of resistance: the tea-party movement of the spring and the town-hall meetings of the summer. With characteristic condescension, they contemptuously dismissed the protests as the mere excrescences of a redneck, retrograde, probably racist rabble.
You would think lefties could discern a proletarian vanguard when they see one. Yet they kept denying the reality of the rising opposition to Obama's social democratic agenda when summer turned to fall and Virginia and New Jersey turned Republican in the year's two gubernatorial elections.
The evidence was unmistakable. Independents, who in 2008 had elected Obama, swung massively against the Democrats: dropping 16 points in Virginia, 21 in New Jersey. On Tuesday, it was even worse: Independents, who had gone 2-to-1 Republican in Virginia and New Jersey, now went 3-to-1 Republican in hyper-blue Massachusetts. Nor was this an expression of the more agitated elements who vote in obscure low-turnout elections. The turnout on Tuesday was the highest for any nonpresidential Massachusetts election in 20 years.
Democratic cocooners will tell themselves that Coakley was a terrible candidate who even managed to diss Curt Schilling. True, Brown had Schilling. But Coakley had Obama. When the bloody sock beats the presidential seal -- of a man who had them swooning only a year ago -- something is going on beyond personality.
That something is substance -- political ideas and legislative agendas. Democrats, if they wish, can write off their Massachusetts humiliation to high unemployment, to Coakley or, the current favorite among sophisticates, to generalized anger. That implies an inchoate, unthinking lashing-out at whoever happens to be in power -- even at your liberal betters who are forcing on you an agenda that you can't even see is in your own interest.
Democrats must so rationalize, otherwise they must take democracy seriously, and ask themselves: If the people really don't want it, could they possibly have a point?
"If you lose Massachusetts and that's not a wake-up call," said moderate -- and sentient -- Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, "there's no hope of waking up."
I say: Let them sleep.
letters@charleskrauthammer.com
Charles Krauthammer - What Scott Brown's win means for the Democrats - washingtonpost.com
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/21/AR2010012103500.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/21/AR2010012103500.html
What Scott Brown's win means for the Democrats
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, January 22, 2010
On Jan. 14, five days before the Massachusetts special election, President Obama was in full bring-it-on mode as he rallied House Democrats behind his health-care reform. "If Republicans want to campaign against what we've done by standing up for the status quo and for insurance companies over American families and businesses, that is a fight I want to have."
The bravado lasted three days. When Obama campaigned in Boston on Jan. 17 for Obamacare supporter Martha Coakley, not once did he mention the health-care bill. When your candidate is sinking, you don't throw her a millstone.
After Coakley's defeat, Obama pretended that the real cause was a generalized anger and frustration "not just because of what's happened in the last year or two years, but what's happened over the last eight years."
Let's get this straight: The antipathy to George W. Bush is so enduring and powerful that . . . it just elected a Republican senator in Massachusetts? Why, the man is omnipotent.
And the Democrats are delusional: Scott Brown won by running against Obama, not Bush. He won by brilliantly nationalizing the race, running hard against the Obama agenda, most notably Obamacare. Killing it was his No. 1 campaign promise.
Bull's-eye. An astonishing 56 percent of Massachusetts voters, according to a Rasmussen poll, called health care their top issue. In a Fabrizio, McLaughlin & Associates poll, 78 percent of Brown voters said their vote was intended to stop Obamacare. Only a quarter of all voters in the Rasmussen poll cited the economy as their top issue, nicely refuting the Democratic view that Massachusetts was just the usual anti-incumbent resentment you expect in bad economic times.
Brown ran on a very specific, very clear agenda. Stop health care. Don't Mirandize terrorists. Don't raise taxes; cut them. And no more secret backroom deals with special interests.
These deals -- the Louisiana purchase, the Cornhusker kickback -- had engendered a national disgust with the corruption and arrogance of one-party rule. The final straw was the union payoff -- in which labor bosses smugly walked out of the White House with a five-year exemption from a ("Cadillac") health insurance tax Democrats were imposing on the 92 percent of private-sector workers who are not unionized.
The reason both wings of American liberalism -- congressional and mainstream media -- were so surprised at the force of anti-Democratic sentiment is that they'd spent Obama's first year either ignoring or disdaining the clear early signs of resistance: the tea-party movement of the spring and the town-hall meetings of the summer. With characteristic condescension, they contemptuously dismissed the protests as the mere excrescences of a redneck, retrograde, probably racist rabble.
You would think lefties could discern a proletarian vanguard when they see one. Yet they kept denying the reality of the rising opposition to Obama's social democratic agenda when summer turned to fall and Virginia and New Jersey turned Republican in the year's two gubernatorial elections.
The evidence was unmistakable. Independents, who in 2008 had elected Obama, swung massively against the Democrats: dropping 16 points in Virginia, 21 in New Jersey. On Tuesday, it was even worse: Independents, who had gone 2-to-1 Republican in Virginia and New Jersey, now went 3-to-1 Republican in hyper-blue Massachusetts. Nor was this an expression of the more agitated elements who vote in obscure low-turnout elections. The turnout on Tuesday was the highest for any nonpresidential Massachusetts election in 20 years.
Democratic cocooners will tell themselves that Coakley was a terrible candidate who even managed to diss Curt Schilling. True, Brown had Schilling. But Coakley had Obama. When the bloody sock beats the presidential seal -- of a man who had them swooning only a year ago -- something is going on beyond personality.
That something is substance -- political ideas and legislative agendas. Democrats, if they wish, can write off their Massachusetts humiliation to high unemployment, to Coakley or, the current favorite among sophisticates, to generalized anger. That implies an inchoate, unthinking lashing-out at whoever happens to be in power -- even at your liberal betters who are forcing on you an agenda that you can't even see is in your own interest.
Democrats must so rationalize, otherwise they must take democracy seriously, and ask themselves: If the people really don't want it, could they possibly have a point?
"If you lose Massachusetts and that's not a wake-up call," said moderate -- and sentient -- Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, "there's no hope of waking up."
I say: Let them sleep.
letters@charleskrauthammer.com
Charles Krauthammer - What Scott Brown's win means for the Democrats - washingtonpost.com
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/21/AR2010012103500.html
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
The RED pill...
R ED Schultz and Dems suffering from Electile Disfunction?
Tell them Morpheus offers the RED pill...for TRUTH!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGQF8LAmiaE
Tell them Morpheus offers the RED pill...for TRUTH!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGQF8LAmiaE
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
The Coward-Snivelin’ Strategy of a Thug
Coakley Thug Roughs Up Reporter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8CdfQGlgVw
The Coakley campaign strategist (aka The Thug) who assaulted The Weekly Standard reporter in our nation's capitol last night might as well admit he's GUILTY of carrying-out classic Saul Alinsky tactics to be used when the rubber meets the road...or in this despicable case, where the reporter meets the ground.
Let's look at how this smoking gun was 'loaded':
Blue Line Strategic Communications was so proud of the fact that The Thug was going to ‘help’ Coakley’s campaign, they tweeted it:
“The DSCC dispatches Blue Line’s Michael Meehan to assist Coakley camp with messaging: http://bit.ly/7jBgcB”
1:29 PM Jan 11th from TweetDeck
http://twitter.com/bluelinedd
I sent @bluelinedd this in response:
"What message?"
The “Don’t f*ck with us DEMS or we'll KNOCK YOU DOWN!” message?
Does "assist" = VIOLENCE?
Go tell your 'associates' at DSCC, "Saul Alinsky tactics won't work!"
http://twitter.com/joekiddone
Here's who The Thug is:
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/meehan
Politico http://www.politico.com/arena/bio/michael_meehan.html
His public profile and bio highlight the work he's done doing "campaign strategy" and "communicating" for Democrat Senators Cantwell, Kerry, Daschle and Boxer (now that's a breeding ground if I've ever heard one), so it's obvious where he mastered his special brand of communicating.
Such is the profile of a thug...
And the Coward-and-Snivelin’ strategy of a thug.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8CdfQGlgVw
The Coakley campaign strategist (aka The Thug) who assaulted The Weekly Standard reporter in our nation's capitol last night might as well admit he's GUILTY of carrying-out classic Saul Alinsky tactics to be used when the rubber meets the road...or in this despicable case, where the reporter meets the ground.
Let's look at how this smoking gun was 'loaded':
Blue Line Strategic Communications was so proud of the fact that The Thug was going to ‘help’ Coakley’s campaign, they tweeted it:
“The DSCC dispatches Blue Line’s Michael Meehan to assist Coakley camp with messaging: http://bit.ly/7jBgcB”
1:29 PM Jan 11th from TweetDeck
http://twitter.com/bluelinedd
I sent @bluelinedd this in response:
"What message?"
The “Don’t f*ck with us DEMS or we'll KNOCK YOU DOWN!” message?
Does "assist" = VIOLENCE?
Go tell your 'associates' at DSCC, "Saul Alinsky tactics won't work!"
http://twitter.com/joekiddone
Here's who The Thug is:
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/meehan
Politico http://www.politico.com/arena/bio/michael_meehan.html
His public profile and bio highlight the work he's done doing "campaign strategy" and "communicating" for Democrat Senators Cantwell, Kerry, Daschle and Boxer (now that's a breeding ground if I've ever heard one), so it's obvious where he mastered his special brand of communicating.
Such is the profile of a thug...
And the Coward-and-Snivelin’ strategy of a thug.
Friday, January 8, 2010
Chesley B. Sullenberger: A true American hero!
Captain Chesley Burnett "Sully" Sullenberger III and every member of his flight crew are American HEROES...and Flight 1549's landing was a MIRACLE!
And "Sully" should've been TIME Magazine's 2009 Man of the Year!
Brace for Impact: The Chesley B. Sullenberger Story will debut on TLC this Sunday, January 10th at 9PM.
The documentary film explores the real life adventure of Capt. Sullenberger and Flight 1549 as he re-traces the flight that landed in the Hudson.
http://tlc.discovery.com/tv/brace-for-impact/brace-for-impact.html
Here's amazing technical animation and scientific visualization from Exosphere3D.com:
Cactus Flight 1549 Accident Reconstruction (US Airways)
http://www.exosphere3d.com/pubwww/pages/project_gallery/cactus_1549_hudson_river.html
Flight 1549 3D Reconstruction, Hudson River Ditching Jan 15, 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE_5eiYn0D0
YEAH!
And "Sully" should've been TIME Magazine's 2009 Man of the Year!
Brace for Impact: The Chesley B. Sullenberger Story will debut on TLC this Sunday, January 10th at 9PM.
The documentary film explores the real life adventure of Capt. Sullenberger and Flight 1549 as he re-traces the flight that landed in the Hudson.
http://tlc.discovery.com/tv/brace-for-impact/brace-for-impact.html
Here's amazing technical animation and scientific visualization from Exosphere3D.com:
Cactus Flight 1549 Accident Reconstruction (US Airways)
http://www.exosphere3d.com/pubwww/pages/project_gallery/cactus_1549_hudson_river.html
Flight 1549 3D Reconstruction, Hudson River Ditching Jan 15, 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE_5eiYn0D0
YEAH!
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Uh oh...
You know things are uʍop-ǝpısdn when analysts refer to Obama's "The buck stops with me" as a 'significant development'...
SEE what I mean...
If it's THERE and you can SEE it, it's REAL.
If it's NOT there and you can SEE it, it's VIRTUAL.
If it's THERE and you CAN'T see it, it's either TRANSPARENT...or it's called ObamaCare, which is WITHOUT "transparency" because Obama WON'T LET YOU SEE IT!
But if you CAN'T see it because it's NOT THERE, you either KILLED THE BILL...or you erased it!
SEE what I mean? LOL
If it's NOT there and you can SEE it, it's VIRTUAL.
If it's THERE and you CAN'T see it, it's either TRANSPARENT...or it's called ObamaCare, which is WITHOUT "transparency" because Obama WON'T LET YOU SEE IT!
But if you CAN'T see it because it's NOT THERE, you either KILLED THE BILL...or you erased it!
SEE what I mean? LOL
Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot?
Obama spoke about 'failing to connect the dots' but his policy on terrorism GUARANTEES there will be LESS dots to connect!
His policy also INVITES terrorists onto American soil because for them, it would be better to get Mirandized HERE, AFTER they attack, then to get killed there by a Predator drone before.
Obama's policy on terrorism MAKES US LESS SAFE!
Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot, over?
His policy also INVITES terrorists onto American soil because for them, it would be better to get Mirandized HERE, AFTER they attack, then to get killed there by a Predator drone before.
Obama's policy on terrorism MAKES US LESS SAFE!
Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot, over?
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
THAT'S what Obama's about...
Watch this video but substitute Obama asking you if you'd like TRANSPARENCY instead of a pony:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qb0vquRcys
THAT'S what Obama's about...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qb0vquRcys
THAT'S what Obama's about...
Sunday, January 3, 2010
Ted Nugent ROCKS!
Ted Nugent ROCKS here when he discusses the Second Amendment:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCHtw6WbbnM
Enjoy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCHtw6WbbnM
Enjoy!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
